StyleWatch Style News Now

Style News Now

Dakota Fanning’s Marc Jacobs Ad Banned for Being Too Racy

11/09/2011 at 12:00 PM ET

Dakota Fanning Oh, Lola
Courtesy Marc Jacobs

Dakota Fanning‘s latest role has received a big thumbs-down in the U.K.

The actress’s recent magazine ad for Marc Jacobs’s Oh, Lola! perfume is too suggestive, Britain’s advertising watchdog has ruled, and must be pulled immediately, the BBC reports.

The ad in question shows the 17-year-old American actress in a thigh-length dotted dress with an oversize flower-topped bottle of Oh, Lola! resting between her legs.

The U.K.’s Ad Standards Authority determined that “the length of her dress, her leg and position of the perfume bottle drew attention to her sexuality. Because of that, along with her appearance, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualize a child.”

The ASA ruled that the ad was irresponsible, likely to cause “serious offense,” and must not appear again.

Coty UK, the maker of the perfume, had argued that the image was “provoking but not indecent.” On Tuesday, Marc Jacobs released a statement, calling the banning “unfortunate.” He wrote:

“It was our pleasure to work with Dakota Fanning for the Oh, Lola! campaign. She is a smart, pretty, interesting, talented young woman and we would never have suggested an advertising concept that we thought was inappropriate. I believe she is also very thoughtful about the projects she takes on and would not have done something that she felt was in questionable taste. It’s really unfortunate that people have taken anything negative from what we believe is a really good campaign and one that so perfectly embodies the fragrance.” Tell us: Do you think Fanning’s ad is too racy for print?

–Tim Nudd

SHOP STARS’ SIGNATURE SCENTS

Your Reaction

Follow Us

On Newsstands Now

On Newsstands Now

Kim's Delivery Room Drama!
  • Kim's Delivery Room Drama!
  • Katie: A Year After Split
  • Princess Kate: Palace's Baby Plan Revealed

Pick up your copy on newsstands

Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine

Advertisement

Add A Comment

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.

Showing 339 comments

chris on

She’s practically an adult. Its okay for her to do adult like things on screen bc she’s an actress, but when she is acting in an advertisement, its not ok?

Its ok for 13 year olds from ford agency to be practically naked in sheer stuff on the runway in adult clothing, but a 17 year old holding a bottle between her legs is too much?

Betty Finn on

While I understand the age concern, I feel like this would only be seen as sexually suggestive to perverts and pedophiles.

maryj on

I do not see anything wrong with this ad.

JG on

It’s not too explicit at all. Her dress length is appropriate for today’s up and coming youth! It’s not like she has her rear hanging out and the clevege is not too low cut either. So what the perfume is sitting on her lap? She is a beautiful classy young lady and people who are critizing this should really critize more important issues…

Katrina on

Gosh how dirty minded could they be? My mind didnt even went there when I saw the ad! English. So uptight!

Luanna on

Who is this marketing to? Can you imagine walking up to a counter and trying to describe what perfume you’re looking for based on this ad if you couldn’t remember the name? I’d like a bottle of the perfume named after a molested child that was showed as a teenager’s flower please. Trying to figure out how not to be crude, but this immediately makes me think the perfume would smell like a female hygene product.

Serena on

I feel there is nothing wrong with this ad. Dakota is a very classy girl and if you take this ad as being sexual then I think it may be you that has the problem, not the ad.

Melissa on

I think its cute

leilarx on

It’s not that it’s racy, it’s that it IS suggestive. A flower is often used to symbolize women’s genitals. Dakota is underage still and is dressed to look even more childish/innocent. Her face has an innocent girly look to it too. And the term “Lola”, specifically “Lolita” is used by pedophiles to refer to young girls. If you don’t know that consciously, many people would perceive it as such, especially pedophiles. And the symbolism of the flower, the girly look/pose and the term “Lola” I can bet is not lost on the designers of this ad or people at Marc Jacobs.

SALLY on

Yes it is too racy. If the bottle was beside her then it would be different, but the perfume is between her legs (ie fallic undertones).

Next | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | … 34 | Next | Show All
 

From Our Partners