StyleWatch Style News Now

Style News Now

Dakota Fanning’s Marc Jacobs Ad Banned for Being Too Racy

11/09/2011 at 12:00 PM ET

Dakota Fanning Oh, Lola
Courtesy Marc Jacobs

Dakota Fanning‘s latest role has received a big thumbs-down in the U.K.

The actress’s recent magazine ad for Marc Jacobs’s Oh, Lola! perfume is too suggestive, Britain’s advertising watchdog has ruled, and must be pulled immediately, the BBC reports.

The ad in question shows the 17-year-old American actress in a thigh-length dotted dress with an oversize flower-topped bottle of Oh, Lola! resting between her legs.

The U.K.’s Ad Standards Authority determined that “the length of her dress, her leg and position of the perfume bottle drew attention to her sexuality. Because of that, along with her appearance, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualize a child.”

The ASA ruled that the ad was irresponsible, likely to cause “serious offense,” and must not appear again.

Coty UK, the maker of the perfume, had argued that the image was “provoking but not indecent.” On Tuesday, Marc Jacobs released a statement, calling the banning “unfortunate.” He wrote:

“It was our pleasure to work with Dakota Fanning for the Oh, Lola! campaign. She is a smart, pretty, interesting, talented young woman and we would never have suggested an advertising concept that we thought was inappropriate. I believe she is also very thoughtful about the projects she takes on and would not have done something that she felt was in questionable taste. It’s really unfortunate that people have taken anything negative from what we believe is a really good campaign and one that so perfectly embodies the fragrance.” Tell us: Do you think Fanning’s ad is too racy for print?

–Tim Nudd

SHOP STARS’ SIGNATURE SCENTS

Your Reaction

Follow Us

On Newsstands Now

On Newsstands Now

Brad's Devotion: The Inside Story
  • Brad's Devotion: The Inside Story
  • Oklahoma Tornado: Heroic Rescues
  • Michael Douglas on Catherine's Health

Pick up your copy on newsstands

Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine

Advertisement

Add A Comment

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.

Showing 339 comments

Witch w/a B on

I have seen racier pictures with younger teens on facebook! Seriously!

Sadie on

She looks like she’s about 12

Lala on

i think it was a good call, she is only 17 not 18. i think its weird to use children in ads that are meant to sell to adults, it is over sexualizing children. it’s part of the world we live in but it doesn’t mean its right.

April on

If the UK believes that ad is too suggestive for a minor, good for them pulling it. Glad someone has standards and sticks to them!

Amy on

It’d dirty if you have a dirty mind.

Cindy on

It is suggestive, and not a very flattering.It’s like Madonna’s ad with Dolce and Gabbana..her on a couch spread-eagle, and one comment said..”Oh look, Madonna’s trying to sell us her crotch.” Redo the picture..Dakota doesn’t look very pretty in it anyway. And, she’s woman now not a little girl.

Kimberly on

Oh please, give me a break. I love how all these regulations are made by men who probably watch porn anyway.

jean on

The British said it was to racy have u guys seen their newspaper the middle of the page is normally a topless woman, as a centerfold I have seen it really. What in the world. I like the add. I have four daughters of my own its not a bad add.

Slna on

I think the flower is in the wrong place! Don’t you remember when your mother would say “save your flower for marriage”

Agustina on

And the problem with this ad is…? I just don’t see the problem. In fact, it’s a nice picture.

Next | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | … 34 | Next | Show All
 

From Our Partners