StyleWatch Style News Now

Style News Now

Dakota Fanning’s Marc Jacobs Ad Banned for Being Too Racy

11/09/2011 at 12:00 PM ET

Dakota Fanning Oh, Lola
Courtesy Marc Jacobs

Dakota Fanning‘s latest role has received a big thumbs-down in the U.K.

The actress’s recent magazine ad for Marc Jacobs’s Oh, Lola! perfume is too suggestive, Britain’s advertising watchdog has ruled, and must be pulled immediately, the BBC reports.

The ad in question shows the 17-year-old American actress in a thigh-length dotted dress with an oversize flower-topped bottle of Oh, Lola! resting between her legs.

The U.K.’s Ad Standards Authority determined that “the length of her dress, her leg and position of the perfume bottle drew attention to her sexuality. Because of that, along with her appearance, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualize a child.”

The ASA ruled that the ad was irresponsible, likely to cause “serious offense,” and must not appear again.

Coty UK, the maker of the perfume, had argued that the image was “provoking but not indecent.” On Tuesday, Marc Jacobs released a statement, calling the banning “unfortunate.” He wrote:

“It was our pleasure to work with Dakota Fanning for the Oh, Lola! campaign. She is a smart, pretty, interesting, talented young woman and we would never have suggested an advertising concept that we thought was inappropriate. I believe she is also very thoughtful about the projects she takes on and would not have done something that she felt was in questionable taste. It’s really unfortunate that people have taken anything negative from what we believe is a really good campaign and one that so perfectly embodies the fragrance.” Tell us: Do you think Fanning’s ad is too racy for print?

–Tim Nudd

SHOP STARS’ SIGNATURE SCENTS

Your Reaction

Follow Us

On Newsstands Now

On Newsstands Now

Brad's Devotion: The Inside Story
  • Brad's Devotion: The Inside Story
  • Oklahoma Tornado: Heroic Rescues
  • Michael Douglas on Catherine's Health

Pick up your copy on newsstands

Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine

Advertisement

Add A Comment

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.

Showing 339 comments

Achmedspud on

This is not at all racy, some people just have filthy minds :(

marie on

I’d say the ad to me is considered “provocative” but that’s what sells. The fact that she is only seventeen does deem her as a child. If the model were over eighteen, then it would make all the difference in the world. That’s my opinion.

Crystal on

This is absolutely rediculous. The only way this photo can be seen as offensive and suggestive is if it is through the eyes of someone seeking to see a sexualized image. She is covered and holding a flowered bottle in her lap! Whoever see’s something different has a disturbed view on the image in this picture.

Tod on

I would never have glanced at the ad if not for the news story. I also would not have thought of it as anything more than an advertisement for something. Now that the story has drawn my attention to “the length of her dress, her leg and position of the perfume bottle”, I’m feeling just a little bit aroused.

KAT on

OMG!! Are you serious??!! How ridiculous is that! I do not understand why people want to create sexuality when there is none. She looks like a young innocent girl holding a perfume bottle. Quit making a bigger deal than it needs to be. Good grief.

Carol on

Go to college little miss seductive. You need a break and so do we.

Karen on

I do not see the picture as raunchy! To me it’s a girl in a pink dress hold a vase. It’s not like she has her dress hiked up with the vase between her legs and licking her lips! Now that would be raunchy for her age! Get a grip people!

AJ on

Inappropriate due to bottle placement. Her crotch – or any hint of it – should not be the focal point of the ad. Think about it…someone told her precisely where to put that bottle, to hold it next to her pubis. That isn’t right. She’s a minor. Our allowance of, and ambivalence to, the sexualizing of minor girls is part of what’s wrong in this country.

Bay on

It is only dirty because people now a days only think about things in a perverted way. It is these people who are ruining art today. Not everything is sexual and society needs to stop trying to ruin things because they think it is too “racy”.

Katie on

I see nothing wrong with the ad she looks very clasy

Next | 1 … | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | … 34 | Next | Show All
 

From Our Partners