StyleWatch Style News Now

Style News Now

Dakota Fanning’s Marc Jacobs Ad Banned for Being Too Racy

11/09/2011 at 12:00 PM ET

Dakota Fanning Oh, Lola
Courtesy Marc Jacobs

Dakota Fanning‘s latest role has received a big thumbs-down in the U.K.

The actress’s recent magazine ad for Marc Jacobs’s Oh, Lola! perfume is too suggestive, Britain’s advertising watchdog has ruled, and must be pulled immediately, the BBC reports.

The ad in question shows the 17-year-old American actress in a thigh-length dotted dress with an oversize flower-topped bottle of Oh, Lola! resting between her legs.

The U.K.’s Ad Standards Authority determined that “the length of her dress, her leg and position of the perfume bottle drew attention to her sexuality. Because of that, along with her appearance, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualize a child.”

The ASA ruled that the ad was irresponsible, likely to cause “serious offense,” and must not appear again.

Coty UK, the maker of the perfume, had argued that the image was “provoking but not indecent.” On Tuesday, Marc Jacobs released a statement, calling the banning “unfortunate.” He wrote:

“It was our pleasure to work with Dakota Fanning for the Oh, Lola! campaign. She is a smart, pretty, interesting, talented young woman and we would never have suggested an advertising concept that we thought was inappropriate. I believe she is also very thoughtful about the projects she takes on and would not have done something that she felt was in questionable taste. It’s really unfortunate that people have taken anything negative from what we believe is a really good campaign and one that so perfectly embodies the fragrance.” Tell us: Do you think Fanning’s ad is too racy for print?

–Tim Nudd

SHOP STARS’ SIGNATURE SCENTS

Your Reaction

Follow Us

On Newsstands Now

On Newsstands Now

Brad's Devotion: The Inside Story
  • Brad's Devotion: The Inside Story
  • Oklahoma Tornado: Heroic Rescues
  • Michael Douglas on Catherine's Health

Pick up your copy on newsstands

Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine

Advertisement

Add A Comment

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.

Showing 339 comments

Julie Vickrey on

I see no problem with this pic.

huh? on

hmmm well who is the one with a dirty mind…I bet that half the people who have seen it wouldn’t have even thought of that….

Candice on

I think the picture is beautiful, but I can see how it would be perceived as provocative. Maybe if they just changed where they have the bottle of perfume it wouldn’t be so bad.

rosa on

i think those looking at the pic in a perv way are just out of line… her facial expression is inocent looking and she happens to have the bottle between her legs now if she were dressd diff and spread eagle i would say racy wth i looked at pic and couldnt figure out what they were talking about racy till i read on.. that goes to show how i was thinking..

maggz on

Anyone remember that pic of Miley Cyrus with just a sheet? THAT was racy. This is nothing compared to that.

NYC guest on

I am no fan of Dakota Fanning, but I sill don’t think this ad needs to be pulled. Yes, it is VERY suggestive (a “flower” by her “flower”) and will probably immediately make people think of that, but 1) there are plenty of other ads WAY more racy than this one, and 2) is she even a child? isn’t she in college already? If she were underage, then maybe they’d have an argument.

Achmedspud on

What is racy about it ? It looks completely innocent to me.

Taunya Curry on

I don’t think too much is wrong with this.

Gabriela on

This is racy??? Wow, what about that new Carl’s JR commercial with half-naked women basically having sex with their burgers!?!

Emvee on

So have you people who think this is too ‘racy’ ever seen any other Marc Jacobs perfume ads? If you have, you would know that his ad campaigns are known for being like this and that there are much more provocative ads than this one. Sure she’s 17, sure she’s holding the bottle in her lap, but please tell me why an ad is such a problem, but her acting in a movie where she’s doing drugs, having sex, being molested etc isn’t a problem?!?! It’s 2011 people, this is NOT child porn, she is not being sexualized, its an effing perfume ad. Get over it!

Next | 1 … | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | … 34 | Next | Show All
 

From Our Partners