Comments on: Angelina Jolie No Longer the Face of St. John

By: Jade Smith

Jade Smith — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:01:09 +0000

Lola why r u glad they dropped Angelina?

By: Hawk

Hawk — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:55:32 +0000

I think that she still look,s good in all clothes. So all the people that donot like her, Angela is Beautiful so stop and work and your self .

By: skalambakal

skalambakal — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:38:48 +0000

Dumb move from St. John.

By: soon

soon — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:27:51 +0000

St. John are obviously just using Angelina Jolie to get a free publicity.

By: Dawn

Dawn — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:27:17 +0000

I only looked at their clothes because of Angelina – They should make better clothes.

By: Ann

Ann — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:20:06 +0000

One looks as unreal as the other, and neither represents most women, and so the absurdity that the CEO made — the St. John woman… strong, confident, sensual and approachable with effortless glamour — what an utterly absurd comment! Elson, nor Jolie looks in the least bit approachable. They should have gone for America Ferrera, or Janine Garrafallo (sp) or Nia Long, or Ginnifer Goodwin, or one of the female astronauts, or just somebody known for their character, accomplishments for the world, philanthropy, and known for it, and not looks! Not a model. How shallow and absurd!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:18:35 +0000

credit PT re St. John —–

Angie DID overshadow “the brand.” She also made them a buttload of money and saved their asses from bankruptcy. They went from running in the red the year before he adds started running to being back in the black with over $400 million in annual sales. All the while Angie’s ads were plastered all over the world – from billboards to magazines. Funny how the company’s prez forgot to mention that little item. Plus, they promised Angie they’d create a children’s charity with her, but never made good on their promise. The final year of her contract they made a large donation to the Jolie-Pitt Foundation instead. Yet another little item the prez forgot to mention.

By: Stella

Stella — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:13:20 +0000

Huge mistake…Angelina is an US ambassador who does fantastic charitable work. St. John underutilized her and now they want to blame her as not being modern! If SJ had been smarter they would have dressed AJ in SJ for all United Nations events etc. Who cares about Karen Elson…they should have used someone like Cloris Leachman….she’s more like their customer.

By: c stone

c stone — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:04:55 +0000

St John Knits are classy and women with tatoos I am sorry to say are not classy

By: cindy

cindy — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:53:00 +0000

i heard angelina wouldn’t renew. St. John is in financial trouble. So they’re probably happy. They’re a has been brand, only old people wear it.

By: jeanne

jeanne — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:48:34 +0000

St.John are getting the attention they wanted because the news is the all over Internet.

By: Mom Of Twins

Mom Of Twins — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:41:03 +0000

St. WHO?

By: Mom Of Twins

Mom Of Twins — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:40:19 +0000

Dumb move.

By: Dantea

Dantea — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:31:44 +0000

She is going to overshadow anything commercial that she does. Angie is meant for bigger and better things than consumerism.

By: Nancy Carson

Nancy Carson — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:22:00 +0000

She needs to be dropped from everything. I do not like her and never have. She may be beautiful but there are a lot of movie stars just as beautiful and they are not “over-doing” it as she is. She was nothing before she started being an “ambassador”.

By: jenfraud

jenfraud — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:19:47 +0000

Angelina doesn’t have to model for clothing lines. It was St. John’s honor to have her agree modeling for their very boring clothes. Although I have enjoyed their catalogs for the first time because of Angelina’s beauty. Good riddance OF ST. JOHN. Now go back to hiring no-name no-character everyday models.

By: st.who?

st.who? — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:16:20 +0000

maybe I would know who/what St. John is if they would have kept Angelina Jolie as their spokesperson.

By: SeiuC

SeiuC — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:16:19 +0000

I agree with those readers … Jennifer Aniston would be the better spokesperson for boring old St. Johns.

By: fem

fem — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:13:30 +0000

Angelina Jolie is the only female actress in Hollywood who can take on a role originally intended for a man. She doesn’t care for St John

By: Tavia

Tavia — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:12:36 +0000

Well, I can see how she would have overshadowed the brand, but on the other hand, isn’t advertising there to raise awareness of a product? I had never heard of St. John, or at least had never paused in flipping the pages to look at a St. John ad, before she was in them.