Comments on: Jennifer Aniston Undergoes an Onscreen Tress-formation!

By: Clarice

Clarice — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:10:48 +0000

Sometimes her blond hair has been a wig and extensions. You oould tell in Marley and Me. I don’t see the difference.

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 28 May 2009 15:35:59 +0000

Gosh it is role playing, its a wig. This is part of an actor’s job!!

Jen’s a very pretty lady but more so when she is sporting her ‘blonde’ look. Absolutely nothing wrong with this hairstyle on her, in fact she wore similar style in Friends many times.

The style seems to suit the role she is playing as at travelling saleslady. It is subdued to meet the business requirements, nothing wrong here.

This style and coloring for the day-to-day life of Jennifer is really not her at least from our image of this pretty lady.

By: Oli

Oli — Mon, 25 May 2009 18:33:41 +0000

I personally think Jennifer is very attractive, though in this movie, the transformation she went under does take away from her regular fresh, beautiful look. And surely anyone with a brain stem would’ve heard that you should never sacrifice hair over a costume/role/etc. Of course, $10,000 USD, for a wig? Eesh. I don’t know what the producers are thinking. And seriously, people, if you don’t like her, don’t see her stuff. Don’t look at her. Don’t come in and whine about how cruel it is for her not to feed starving orphans with her money. Do you feed starving orphans with yours?

By: Samer

Samer — Sun, 24 May 2009 18:16:24 +0000

I think she is a great actress. I don’t she has to cut her hair very time a director tells her so. However, I dont understand why this wig is crazy expensive.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Sun, 24 May 2009 18:06:44 +0000

I would say the reason she is hesitant about cutting or coloring her hair is because she is known for her hair. It really is her best asset and we all have to work with what we have. And as for her not being a great actress ala Susan Hayward, Barbara Stanwyck, Bette Davis, Katharine Hepburn, et al…Who of the younger generation today, younger than Meryl Streep, is in their class?

By: Buster

Buster — Sun, 24 May 2009 16:54:48 +0000

Oh, and I love the hair however she wears it!!!

By: Buster

Buster — Sun, 24 May 2009 16:51:37 +0000

Jennifer Joanna Aniston (born February 11, 1969). She became famous in the 1990s for her role as Rachel Green in the popular US sitcom Friends, a role for which she won an Emmy Award, a Golden Globe Award, and a Screen Actors Guild Award.

Her net worth $110 million!!

She must be doing something right if she can’t act!!!

By: Simone

Simone — Sun, 24 May 2009 15:21:28 +0000

Wow! Why such rudeness?
And the catty “she’s not so pretty” comments obviously come from people with an ax to grind.
I mean, wouldn’t it be even BETTER if we can proudly say that you don’t have to be a great beauty to have a successful tv and film career?
First people complain that there aren’t enough “ordinary” people in movies, and then complain when there is one!!! Sheesh!

Back to the subject at hand – the wig. It’s a great wig that looks totally natural, and helps her look more like the character she’s playing. And she didn’t have to dye and cut her hair. The wig is a perfect solution. What’s the issue here?

I hope that after the film is over it gets donated to someone without money who suffers from severe hair loss.

By: Karen

Karen — Sun, 24 May 2009 15:12:02 +0000

I love Jen’s hair in the new movie. That color looks great on her and I think she should consider making it permanent. I think it makes her really sexy. A new look would do wonders for her.

By: Karen

Karen — Sun, 24 May 2009 13:58:36 +0000

That is what she would look like without the millions of dollars to spend on her looks. Like a normal person, not someone who is glossy haired and non-frizzy in every public moment!

By: Janet

Janet — Sun, 24 May 2009 12:42:24 +0000

LOL! BLONDE hair? Her hair is naturally dishwater brown and she adds a few blonde highlights. The only reason she’s “known for her hair” is because of the cut she had for Friends WAY back in the day. And I agree, not a good actress, and not an attractive woman. She obviously has more than healthy self esteem, however.

By: chris

chris — Sun, 24 May 2009 12:38:39 +0000

People, it is called acting, wigs and all, personally I think that Jennifer is a very good actress and an attractive young woman and regardless of your negative comments she is living large, probably larger than most of you with the negative comments. People keep going to her movies so think about that. . .

By: Suzie Ward

Suzie Ward — Sun, 24 May 2009 12:28:51 +0000

I think her onscreen hair for Managment looks just fine. I don’t see what all the noise is about. We wig actors & actresses all the time in the theatre. I don’t blame Ms. Aniston for not wanting to mess with her own hair.

By: Nanny

Nanny — Sun, 24 May 2009 12:20:20 +0000

If that is what you get for $10,000, they wasted their money! I would call her a lot of things, but pretty isn’t one of them.

By: muddywrangler

muddywrangler — Sun, 24 May 2009 11:47:58 +0000

to Zoey
the hottest and best actress ever? Are you serious? Are you about 10 years old?

By: newlywedemt

newlywedemt — Thu, 21 May 2009 21:45:20 +0000

i love how everyone seems to think that they know how all wealthy people should spend the $ that they worked for. if she wants to buy a wig with it, so be it. if she wants to spend it on charities, that is nice too. if she wants to roll around in it, that is her choice. diva this, played out that…sounds like a bunch of jealous jen-wannabe’s that probably don’t look half as good after an entire day of beauty.

haters

By: ginger

ginger — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:52:43 +0000

she looks old, but with her bank account she can look anyway she wants….

By: ginger

ginger — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:51:44 +0000

she looks old, but with her bank account she can look anyway she wants…..

By: ginger

ginger — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:49:34 +0000

she looks older with that wig on, but then again with her bank account she can look any way she wants

By: Ashley

Ashley — Wed, 20 May 2009 20:53:22 +0000

Doesn’t count as an actress? She fooled me! I think she’s a great actress and so convincing in her parts! I think she’s gorgeous, unlike scary Angelina!