Comments on: Sarah Jessica Sounds Off on Her Accidental Fashion Faceoff

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:07:08 +0000

Liar, liar, pants on fire!
SJP rules!
Girl power!
You go Sarah.
I bet that designer lost business after this!

By: Michelle

Michelle — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:06:46 +0000

Ok, so the biggest thing Sarah Jessica Parker has to worry about is whether or not anyone has worn a dress before her? How completely self-centered and arrogant she sounds. I hope she’s really not THAT shallow.

By: sasha

sasha — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:49:01 +0000

OMIGOD!!! I WOULD BE SOO PISSED ESPECIALLY SINCE LINDSEY LOHAN ALSO WORE THE DRESS!!!
http://www.people.com/people/lindsay_lohan/photos/0,,20006693_20465824,00.html

By: Randi

Randi — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:08:43 +0000

I wouldn’t care, but i have some friends who would whine about it if i had the same “anything” as them. It’s petty and shalow, so someone else has as good of tatse as you, get over it.

By: Laura

Laura — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:31:20 +0000

SJP needs to get over herself! It’s just a dress and not a really decent one either! She’s just not that important in the scheme of things and neither is that fugly dress she wore.

By: Kylar

Kylar — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:57:29 +0000

If she had been told that the dress had not been worn, than SJP would have never known. There should be no faceoff because there was no fair chance. SJP looked stunning in it, anyway.

By: Coco

Coco — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:57:15 +0000

If I were SJP, I would be so upset! This dress is so gorgeous and she looked great in it, but thats not the issue. Celebrities wear dresses that have been seen on red carpets before all the time,(just look at fashion face-off). Its the fact that the designer lied to her just to get the publicity for the dress. It was a backstabbing move, he completely used SJP’s fame to get more attention for his gown.

By: Sophie

Sophie — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:17:34 +0000

If I were in this situation, I would still be pretty thrilled that I had gotten to wear such a gorgeous dress in the first place, and that I was a famous
actress with a successful tv show and people were taking pictures of me everywhere I went. I would also be happy knowing that even if someone else wore it I looked way better in it than she did.I would be a little pissed off at the designer, but not really, cause if it wasn’t for them, the dress wouldn’t even exist for me to wear.

By: Marti

Marti — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:39:27 +0000

I can see how SJP would be upset, given her industry and special night. However,let’s face it, it’s just a dress and everybody at the premier MATCHED and looked fabulous! Everything happens for a reason.

By: Aubrey

Aubrey — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:22:30 +0000

Even though wearing the dress again isn’t really a big deal, it is wrong that the designer lied to her when he knew that that had already been worn. that was wrong.

By: Ebeth

Ebeth — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:14:16 +0000

I think SJP handled this well. She puts it in perspective by prefacing her comments with, “I know it’s only a dress…”, and states her case well. She shouldn’t have been lied to, and obviously was! And the comment, “I’m upset that she’s upset”? What does that mean? That he thinks she shouldn’t be upset, and is upset that she is? That he’s upset only that she’s upset, and not that his designer lied and sullied the reputation of the company? Either way, it’s LAME.

By: nicole maddington

nicole maddington — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:01:31 +0000

i would be upset if i was her! To find out lindsay lohan of all people woere it before her? Ridiculous!!

That is possibly one of the worst things that could have happened to her with the opening. Oh well the designer has to face that now no one will wear hsi stuff to openings…except lindsay because no one else will want her wearing theirs

By: Liz

Liz — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:58:36 +0000

“unethical?”
Hah, wearing fur that still have heads attached is unethical…

By: Renee

Renee — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:12:52 +0000

Just a little update- the “socialite” you all are referring to is actually an editor of Vogue. And while lying about the dress being worn previously, as Theyskens did, is not right under any circumstances, perhaps he felt more loyalty to Ms. Santo Domingo considering that he had also designed her wedding gown.

By: dmagdalene

dmagdalene — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:00:56 +0000

it is not the “same-dress” fiasco that is upsetting…it is the OUTRIGHT LIE of the designer…i suggest that designers who deceive anyone should be banned from any major event and blacklisted.

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:20:36 +0000

I’m torn. I think it’s much a do about nothing. It’s just a dress. I mean we are paying $4 a gallon for gas now days. So we have bigger fish to fry. BUT I also think there’s a thing called principal. Not too cool. They just should’ve been honest about it.

By: Secretive Person

Secretive Person — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:29:12 +0000

I wouldn’t care!
10) SJP looks 5,000,000,000,000,000 times better in the dress and
2) Who is Lauren Santo Domingo? Is she an award winning actress? I DON’T THINK SO!!!

This Oliver guy sounds like a creeper anyways….

By: sally

sally — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:39:57 +0000

Importance is irrelevant. Being lied to sucks. I don’t blame her for being upset.

By: penny

penny — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:39:18 +0000

Face it ladies….when we buy that perfect dress to wear to a class reunion or to a really nice party, the last thing we want to see is someone wearing the same dress we are wearing.. Am I right??? Fact of the matter is, she wanted a special dress for her special day and the designer lied to her.

By: Diana

Diana — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:42:47 +0000

This is in reply to all the people saying “It’s just a dress” and “There’s more serious issues in the world”

1. If you read the article SJP said “In the big picture, this is not important” meaning the fact that the dress was worn before is NOT the fact. It could have been worn a billion times before. The issue is the designer LIED!! No one likes being lied to especially when it’s for such an important night in their career. To you it may not matter, but this is HER career and her work, just like you have your career and your work.

2. Yes there are insanely more important issues in the world such as hunger, earthquakes, war etc. but if you want to read about that go to CNN.com not People.com. If you’re on this website it’s to read about celebrities and fashion. To get your mind off of the real issues for a minute and there is nothing wrong with that.

3. The judgemental people critisizing SJP know nothing. Because like another person said on here, she grew up poor and does a lot for poor children. She is very humble and private that is why it’s not so known. Before SATC the movie started to promote, when’s the last time you saw her on TMZ or the front page of the tabloids. She is very classy and you all should stop being so envious.