http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/ Your daily dose of who, what and wear Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:14:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://img2.timeinc.net/people/static/i/v4home/peoplelogo.pnghttp://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com20485Your daily dose of who, what and wear http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-96006 Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:00:46 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-96006 I love Mary Janes and two tone shoes so this is perfect

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87680 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:08:26 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87680 I LOVE THESE SHOES!!!!!!

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87088 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:52:54 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87088 I used to have some bone colored mary janes like these with the black toe, only with chunkier heels, in the 60′s. They were my favorite shoes!

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87082 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:54:33 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87082 Very attractive and sexy shoes.

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87044 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:49:28 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87044 I would ROCK those with an A line dress (think 50′s) of the same reddish color and a brown belt or some Cuffed dress slacks of the same dark color (on the toe) (think fedora).

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87008 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:13:55 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-87008 cute, but too high

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-86555 Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:11:03 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-86555 those are really cute but i don’t were high heels. i have no need. sorry i love my brown and pink tennis shoes for dress up. but those are super cute for someone who would wear them.

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-86535 Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:02:27 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-86535 Those shoes are hideous.

]]> http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-86530 Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:20:22 +0000 http://offtherack.people.com/2007/09/13/trend-for-less-must-have-mary-janes-for-under-100/#comment-86530 I’m glad you guys have some non-leather alternatives! It’s so hard to know where to look for CUTE animal-friendly shoes… Clogs aren’t really my “thing.”

]]>