<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth Behind Kate Walsh&#8217;s New Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of who, what and wear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jezebell</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-75643</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezebell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-75643</guid>
		<description>I thinks she looks better without the bangs. The sideswept bangs look great though =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thinks she looks better without the bangs. The sideswept bangs look great though =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40985</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40985</guid>
		<description>To be honest I think that Kate would look stunning whatever her hairstyle, but I think she should leave her hair as it is. She looks absolutely gorgeous with centre-parted, red wavy hair; it suits her face well and makes her look classically glamorous. I heart kate!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I think that Kate would look stunning whatever her hairstyle, but I think she should leave her hair as it is. She looks absolutely gorgeous with centre-parted, red wavy hair; it suits her face well and makes her look classically glamorous. I heart kate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolle</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40984</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40984</guid>
		<description>She&#039;d look better with some side-swept bangs, not those heavy, blunt-cut ones.  She looks better without bangs than with those.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;d look better with some side-swept bangs, not those heavy, blunt-cut ones.  She looks better without bangs than with those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40983</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40983</guid>
		<description>I think the bangs soften her facial features and make her look younger. The look would be much better if the bangs were thinned out a little though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bangs soften her facial features and make her look younger. The look would be much better if the bangs were thinned out a little though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40982</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40982</guid>
		<description>Please please please don&#039;t cut those bangs. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please please don&#8217;t cut those bangs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryse</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40981</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40981</guid>
		<description>Yuck, I&#039;m glad those aren&#039;t her real bangs. While I think Kate would look good with bangs, not this type of bang cut. The bangs are too heavy and somewhat harsh. She should thin the bangs out more and do them sideswept. I think with sideswept bangs the look would be more suttle on her. She&#039;s a beautiful woman regardless. I also agree on the side part, I don&#039;t like the part down the middle.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck, I&#8217;m glad those aren&#8217;t her real bangs. While I think Kate would look good with bangs, not this type of bang cut. The bangs are too heavy and somewhat harsh. She should thin the bangs out more and do them sideswept. I think with sideswept bangs the look would be more suttle on her. She&#8217;s a beautiful woman regardless. I also agree on the side part, I don&#8217;t like the part down the middle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40980</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40980</guid>
		<description>Definitely a side part, shorten the bangs to eyebrow length and thin them out to about one third of this mane shown. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a side part, shorten the bangs to eyebrow length and thin them out to about one third of this mane shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40979</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40979</guid>
		<description>I like her with bangs, it really makes her eyes standout.
I would recommend them not being so heavy, her hair looks good straighter.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like her with bangs, it really makes her eyes standout.<br />
I would recommend them not being so heavy, her hair looks good straighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40978</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40978</guid>
		<description>I actually really like it. It brings out her eyes and nice jaw-line a bit more. And I don&#039;t typically like heavy straight bangs. She looks all nappy-headed in the picture without them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually really like it. It brings out her eyes and nice jaw-line a bit more. And I don&#8217;t typically like heavy straight bangs. She looks all nappy-headed in the picture without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glad</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40977</link>
		<dc:creator>glad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40977</guid>
		<description>i think that she should leave her hair as it is..i dont like how the bangs looks on her....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that she should leave her hair as it is..i dont like how the bangs looks on her&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40976</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40976</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love Kate Walsh &amp; she&#039;s one of the most beautiful women who walk on this earth but I think she looks better without the bangs. Maybe thinner bangs would look better but these are too full. Still, she looks beautiful with both.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love Kate Walsh &amp; she&#8217;s one of the most beautiful women who walk on this earth but I think she looks better without the bangs. Maybe thinner bangs would look better but these are too full. Still, she looks beautiful with both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40975</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40975</guid>
		<description>I love Kate Walsh and think she is gorgeous, but the bangs definitely don&#039;t do much for her.  She has worn her hair with more of a side part before, it looks good on her.  As long as she stays away from the bangs she will continue to look amazing!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Kate Walsh and think she is gorgeous, but the bangs definitely don&#8217;t do much for her.  She has worn her hair with more of a side part before, it looks good on her.  As long as she stays away from the bangs she will continue to look amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Davis</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40974</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40974</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s beautiful - but I think the bangs are too heavy.  Sideswept bangs might be sexy

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s beautiful &#8211; but I think the bangs are too heavy.  Sideswept bangs might be sexy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faith</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40973</link>
		<dc:creator>faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40973</guid>
		<description>i agree with julie about doing a side part.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with julie about doing a side part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40972</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40972</guid>
		<description>Those bangs look silly to me.  They are way too thick, long, and in her eyes.  Gives me a headache to just look at this picture.  They are not cute!  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those bangs look silly to me.  They are way too thick, long, and in her eyes.  Gives me a headache to just look at this picture.  They are not cute!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40971</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40971</guid>
		<description>NO, she should not cut her bangs.  those bangs make her look like an idiot.  very ugly on a normally very attractive woman.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, she should not cut her bangs.  those bangs make her look like an idiot.  very ugly on a normally very attractive woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summy</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40970</link>
		<dc:creator>Summy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40970</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s the lighting or makeup too.  She looks a lot younger with the bangs.  I would go with bangs.
Without she looks harsh.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the lighting or makeup too.  She looks a lot younger with the bangs.  I would go with bangs.<br />
Without she looks harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather S.</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40969</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40969</guid>
		<description>AMAZINGLY those are fake?  They&#039;re not even human hair, let alone her own!  I think she looks better without such full bangs, but it may be pretty with thinner bangs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMAZINGLY those are fake?  They&#8217;re not even human hair, let alone her own!  I think she looks better without such full bangs, but it may be pretty with thinner bangs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40968</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40968</guid>
		<description>I like bangs in general, but hers (well, her fake ones) looked way to heavy for her face. I&#039;m glad to hear it&#039;s just a piece. Maybe actual bangs would look good. Side-swept ones would be easier to sport I think. She&#039;s beautiful anyway! 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blancheneigeny.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.blancheneigeny.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like bangs in general, but hers (well, her fake ones) looked way to heavy for her face. I&#8217;m glad to hear it&#8217;s just a piece. Maybe actual bangs would look good. Side-swept ones would be easier to sport I think. She&#8217;s beautiful anyway! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.blancheneigeny.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blancheneigeny.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40967</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/kate-walsh-2/#comment-40967</guid>
		<description>Or, actually, she might look great with no bangs but SIDE-parted hair.  Parting her hair in the middle doesn&#039;t look so great, in my opinion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, actually, she might look great with no bangs but SIDE-parted hair.  Parting her hair in the middle doesn&#8217;t look so great, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
