Jennifer Garner’s Sweet Jewelry for Daughter Violet

KT from Cda March 22nd, 2007

It’s cute but a little too much mulla.

j March 22nd, 2007

can anyone say ‘choking hazzard’ ?!? i can see MAYBE earrings or a bracelet, but a necklace is ignorant to put on a child that small…

Shauna March 22nd, 2007

How adorable!!! I would buy one for myself since I don’t have any kids yet.

May March 22nd, 2007

If I had a little girl I would definetly but it, but J you are right it does seem like chokin hazzard. I changed my mind. I would rather have it in a earring or bracelet. I totally agree with J.

TB March 22nd, 2007

Jennifer needs to spend that money on new shoes, have you seen the latest busted tennis shoes she wears.

Dawn March 22nd, 2007

400 dollars for a little girl who would rather have that shinny jewlery from a vending machine seems silly. But i guess if you got it flaunt it.

Alice March 22nd, 2007

I think its a sweet necklace but for some reason, I just never liked the idea of jewelery on babies, even earrings. It just seems so unnecessary.

Shel March 22nd, 2007

Holy cow, that’s a definite choking hazard, especially if the charm somehow detaches while the kid chews on the necklace (and you know if you have kids that that is a distinct possibility). Save the necklaces for ages 5 and up. But it is too cute, so maybe Jen can keep it in a jewelry box for when her daughter is older.

sarah March 22nd, 2007

that’s a little ridiculous for an infant to have a diamond and gold necklace but i guess they are rich

Julie March 22nd, 2007

A lot of parents buy a special gold charm or gold cross for small children as a keepsake. They only wear it on special occasions, like a church dedication or a party, and then it’s saved for when they’re older, and sometimes even for when they have kids. I doubt she’s going to let Violet gnaw on it and play with it.