<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shanna Moakler&#8217;s New Bangs: Love &#8216;Em or Hate &#8216;Em?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of who, what and wear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-70541</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-70541</guid>
		<description>i really hate the bangs. she should have kept her hair the way it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really hate the bangs. she should have kept her hair the way it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42576</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42576</guid>
		<description>Shanna is very preety no matter what, but i definetely like her without bangs better.I actually thinks he looks sexier without the bangs and a lot younger and more wild.she looks too sweet with bangs and not all sultry like she usually looks.I really don&#039;t think she&#039;s going to keep this look becacue i heard soemwhere that she thought it made her look like Tara Connor and she didn&#039;t like that.
she doesn&#039;t need makeup to be beautiful but it&#039;s  just that i&#039;m used to her being all dolled up so as much as i like ehr either way i have to go with her original look being better

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shanna is very preety no matter what, but i definetely like her without bangs better.I actually thinks he looks sexier without the bangs and a lot younger and more wild.she looks too sweet with bangs and not all sultry like she usually looks.I really don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s going to keep this look becacue i heard soemwhere that she thought it made her look like Tara Connor and she didn&#8217;t like that.<br />
she doesn&#8217;t need makeup to be beautiful but it&#8217;s  just that i&#8217;m used to her being all dolled up so as much as i like ehr either way i have to go with her original look being better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42575</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42575</guid>
		<description>Love her bangs.. I think she looks adorable!! But she looked beautiful before.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love her bangs.. I think she looks adorable!! But she looked beautiful before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Nick Wenkel</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42574</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Nick Wenkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42574</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I just wanna state that I`m in total agreement with Roxxie girl &amp; Nicole, who said that thick, heavy bangs are IN !
Dense bangs, allowed to fall(combed) straight down are really GORGEOUS, BEAUTIFUL and soo HOT !!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I just wanna state that I`m in total agreement with Roxxie girl &amp; Nicole, who said that thick, heavy bangs are IN !<br />
Dense bangs, allowed to fall(combed) straight down are really GORGEOUS, BEAUTIFUL and soo HOT !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alley</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42573</link>
		<dc:creator>Alley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42573</guid>
		<description>I think her bangs look great. She is one of the prettiest celebrities out there and for all the people that are posting otherwise see if you look that good after 3 kids. Probably why travis came back. Shes hot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think her bangs look great. She is one of the prettiest celebrities out there and for all the people that are posting otherwise see if you look that good after 3 kids. Probably why travis came back. Shes hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonya</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42572</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 01:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42572</guid>
		<description>I love the BANGS! They are so cute, she looks like a doll. 
I say WHATEVER to the people that say no!
The picture of her is not the greatest i admit that, but it&#039;s a new change that i think she should keep!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the BANGS! They are so cute, she looks like a doll.<br />
I say WHATEVER to the people that say no!<br />
The picture of her is not the greatest i admit that, but it&#8217;s a new change that i think she should keep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupael</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42569</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42569</guid>
		<description>she should do a cha-cha bangs . those big 80s hair and the fringe so huge its gonna explode
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she should do a cha-cha bangs . those big 80s hair and the fringe so huge its gonna explode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STEPHANIE</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42568</link>
		<dc:creator>STEPHANIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42568</guid>
		<description>I THINK SHE LOOKS BETTER THE WAY SHE WAS BEFORE.!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I THINK SHE LOOKS BETTER THE WAY SHE WAS BEFORE.!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy E.</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42567</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42567</guid>
		<description>I think she looks like the girl from Family Ties in the pic on the right.  She looks hot in the pic on the left.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she looks like the girl from Family Ties in the pic on the right.  She looks hot in the pic on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42566</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ts a wig people.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ts a wig people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kye</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42565</link>
		<dc:creator>kye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42565</guid>
		<description>The bang dose no good for her facial shape

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bang dose no good for her facial shape</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachael</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42564</link>
		<dc:creator>rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42564</guid>
		<description> i think shanna is way hotter without bangs
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think shanna is way hotter without bangs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachael</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42563</link>
		<dc:creator>rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42563</guid>
		<description> i think shanna is way hotter without bangs
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think shanna is way hotter without bangs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachael</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42562</link>
		<dc:creator>rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42562</guid>
		<description>i think that shanna is way more hotter without bangs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that shanna is way more hotter without bangs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42561</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42561</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42560</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42560</guid>
		<description>She looks like a grown-up, now.(right photo)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks like a grown-up, now.(right photo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jana</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42559</link>
		<dc:creator>jana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42559</guid>
		<description>IT DOESN&#039;T EVEN LOOK LIKE HER!!! I DON&#039;T LIKE THE BANGS!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT DOESN&#8217;T EVEN LOOK LIKE HER!!! I DON&#8217;T LIKE THE BANGS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breezy</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42558</link>
		<dc:creator>Breezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42558</guid>
		<description>I love the bangs...makes her look young and fresh for spring 2007!!! 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the bangs&#8230;makes her look young and fresh for spring 2007!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42557</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42557</guid>
		<description>I agree with Sandy - a lot of people were very rude! I think Shanna&#039;s bangs look great! The look is much softer and quite retro - and very flattering. The lack of heavy makeup also makes her look very sweet and girl-next-door sexy. Reminds me very much of blonde bombshell Agnetha of ABBA fame. Happy Birthday Shanna!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sandy &#8211; a lot of people were very rude! I think Shanna&#8217;s bangs look great! The look is much softer and quite retro &#8211; and very flattering. The lack of heavy makeup also makes her look very sweet and girl-next-door sexy. Reminds me very much of blonde bombshell Agnetha of ABBA fame. Happy Birthday Shanna!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42556</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylewatch.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/shanna-moaklers/#comment-42556</guid>
		<description>SHES HOT EITHER WAY..BUT I LIKE THE BANGS...SHE LOOKS MORE HER AGE AND MORE LIKE A MOMMY... EVEN THOUGH SHE IS GORGEOUS IN THE LEFT PIC...HER ROOTS AND HER EYEBROWS MATCH...TRASHY LOOKING!..THE BANGS GIVE HER A SOFTER LOOK.:)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHES HOT EITHER WAY..BUT I LIKE THE BANGS&#8230;SHE LOOKS MORE HER AGE AND MORE LIKE A MOMMY&#8230; EVEN THOUGH SHE IS GORGEOUS IN THE LEFT PIC&#8230;HER ROOTS AND HER EYEBROWS MATCH&#8230;TRASHY LOOKING!..THE BANGS GIVE HER A SOFTER LOOK.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
