September 27, 2006 | 12:06 pm

It’s Night and Day for Kirsten Dunst

Yesterday afternoon, Kirsten Dunst hit the streets of LA looking like a typically hip 24-year old in skinny jeans and a t-shirt, adding her own quirky spin with narrow suspenders. But just a few hours later, she looked positively regal in a Christian Lacroix chiffon gown at a special screening of her new film Marie Antoinette, in which she plays the title role. Gone are the messy ponytail and bare face of the afternoon, replaced by artfully pulled back locks and perfectly rosy cheeks. It’s amazing what a big difference a few hours can make (Just ask Jessica Simpson!). Tell us: Which look do you prefer on Kirsten: casual or glam?

Photo: X17; John Shearer/WireImage

Permalink | Comments (43) | Category: Fashion, Kirsten Dunst, Red Carpet

Post to:
Facebook
Digg

E-mail
RSS
- My AOL
- My Google
- My Yahoo
- My MSN
- RSS

Buy Guitar God Jewelry For a Good Cause Get in Bed with Michael Kors

+ Add a comment

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | Show All

jen September 27th, 2006

glam works best for her. if she’s not dressed up she looks like a slob. & what’s w/the nasty look she always seems to have on her face?! total attitude.

Natalie September 27th, 2006

I like the glam look better. Some may like her casual look, but I think it looks horrendous. I know some may hate me, but I like the skinny jeans look and the shoes. But……I hate the suspenders, and I think she could have chosen a little more of a flattering shirt and I also think she should brush her hair. That’s my personal opinion, but who says you have to be all dressed up when it comes to doing everyday things. I guess her casual look lets her be comfortable. You don’t have to dress up if you go to the gym or even grocery shopping. I admire her for wearing what she feels comfortable in. So if she’s comfotable, that’s all that matters, but I still don’t like the suspenders, lol, but I still love you Kirsten.

Rebecca September 27th, 2006

I honestly don’t care much for Kirsten Dunst. She seems to be stuck up, never looks like she is having fun. Between these photos glam is better looking.. but the casual is not horrible.

~Andrea~ September 27th, 2006

GLAM for sure! I really don’t like her “casual” look. She looks so ….Blah.

Sara September 27th, 2006

I’ve actually met Kirsten before and she was EXTREMELY nice, so all of those saying she looks stuck up, maybe its because there’s a camera in her face! I do agree that she does look a little sloppy when she’s not dressing up for something, but who cares! she’s comfortable!

Brittany September 27th, 2006

GLAM!

v September 27th, 2006

Is she supposed to be wearing a ball-gown while running errands during the day? GAWD PEOPLE, she dressed appriately for what she’s doing. I think she looks casual for her casual look and spiffy for her evening look.

Deb September 27th, 2006

She looks like she’s getting really skinny!

Rebecca September 27th, 2006

Glam- she definitely looks prettier in the glam dress. The casual look is not terrible, but I’m not digging the suspenders and skinny jeans.

Tea September 27th, 2006

I prefer her in Glam mode, although I do not like or understand either. She is very…blah, nothing much else

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | Show All

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.